
Map in. Traps out. Proof attached.
Turning movement research into a pest-placement decision.
to field decisions
This started close to home.
Movement modelling is my route in; my grandfather's strawberries are why it feels personal.
A trap is where movement becomes evidence.
Lures attract, sticky cards catch, and monitoring points count what is happening in the crop row.
metres
A few metres can change the work that follows.
Better placement can reduce wasted checks, chemical pressure, and weak explanations.
movement changes when space has structureMovement is uncertain. The environment shapes it.
Encounters are not random once space has structure.
ECEF moved the model toward a user decision.
A clever equation is not enough; someone has to act on the answer.
The fellowship made the idea visible.
User, evidence, prototype, and story all had to become concrete.
A simple workflow people can question.
Map, budget, coordinates, proof: each step should be explainable.
$ biopath solve --map site.json > ranked trap plan > benchmark artifact saved
The prototype makes the story concrete.
Solver, API, web demo, and saved run outputs make the workflow tangible.
walkable areas + barriersThe map makes the assumptions visible.
A synthetic site lets us discuss the logic without private field data.

Coordinates, not just a picture.
The decision shifts from gut feel alone to a placement that can be tested.
Early evidence turns the next test specific.
Demo metrics are not the finish line; they define what a pilot should measure.
The hard question is trust.
From can it work? to who would use it, pay for it, and repeat it?
I had to translate novelty into value.
Start with the decision; bring in the method only when it helps.
Map in. Traps out. Proof attached.
The idea has to be simple enough to travel without me in the room.
A useful tool needs rules of the road.
IP, pilots, partners, and adoption route matter because they protect the next step.
The next step needs real sites.
I am looking for pilot conversations, pest-control expertise, and practical feedback.
The route to use has already started.
Ceres Agri-Tech LINCAM EOI advice is underway, with software/IP information submitted through Bristol.
From showcase to pilot conversation.
One partner site, one baseline map, one evidence plan.
LinkedIn
Xiaoxiao Zhouyi
One useful decision, made clearer.
Thanks to ECEF, my supervisor Luca Giuggioli, Bristol Innovations, and the Ceres Agri-Tech conversations.